I am trying to figure out an idea of mine as follows,
Being the strategy of corresponding candidate matching is to intersect viewing ray planes belonging to the two images at a time, specific constraints are needed for the rejection of fault matching and also for the reaching of optimal construction (i.e. 3D lines).
My question is, I want to say that I need constraints for two things
- the rejection of fault matching, and
- the reaching of optimal construction (i.e. 3D lines).
If these two things are written as shown in my sentence, then
- should I need to use for for explaning both requrements?
- Also, should the second phrase be follow the same structure as first phrase? (that mean: for something of something)