0

Will all the three sentences express this idea naturally?

enter image description here

Section two roughly symmetrical pieces of your hair at the front. (Used by an American on a website.)

Or

Take two sections of your hair at the front.

Do all of these sentences sound natural and likely to you????

And what about:

Take a small section of hair in the front.

Here are a few links: https://www.instructables.com/id/Two-Small-Braids/

https://oureverydaylife.com/small-single-braids-yourself-20372.html

https://www.byrdie.com/boxer-braids-tutorial

https://www.ouidad.com/blog/classic-02

So do those three sentences sound equally likely?

  • I might just call them lengths, but hanks, strands and locks would also be quite common (and more specific to "hair"). – FumbleFingers Reinstate Monica May 27 '19 at 15:32
  • I think section here is fine. Divide something into sections. English would allow for that. It's not academic writing...Merriam Webster: to cut or separate into sections. – Lambie May 29 '19 at 15:55
2

I don't think "section" as a verb is unnatural in this context. I've certainly heard it in hair tutorials on youtube by plenty of different native speakers. Though I have heard it by itself, "section off" sounds more natural to my ear.

"Section off two equal pieces of hair at the forehead/behind the ear/at the crown of the head."

That said, I think "section" is much more common as a noun in this context (ex: "Separate/divide your hair into three equal sections, and bring the first section over the second") so using it as a verb as well might sound a little strange because it's duplicative.

David Siegel's first three examples sound natural to me; the fourth one ("take a set of hair") sounds really off.

  • So is the use of "pieces" natural according to you? Does it sound like a single "cut off" hair strand? – It's about English May 29 '19 at 15:25
  • And what do you think about :"Take two sections of hair in the front." – It's about English May 29 '19 at 15:27
  • Pieces is natural in the context. I wouldn't necessarily use it to describe someone else's completed hairdo, but in instructions for creating a hairstyle, it's perfectly fine. – Katy May 29 '19 at 15:27
  • I would say "take two sections of hair in front" is fluent enough, but not helpful as an initial instruction. I might expect it after a first instruction that says something like "Divide the hair into six sections, three on each side of the center part. Take the two sections of hair in front and..." – Katy May 29 '19 at 15:30
  • Does "pieces" sound like a "cut off" hair strand or just a small portion of hair ? And what sounds most likely to you "portion, "section" or "pieces"? – It's about English May 29 '19 at 15:33
1

The first two sound very unnatural. I would not use the word "section" as a verb in this context.

I would say things such as:

  • Part the hair in the center.
  • Divide the hair into two sections.
  • Separate the hair into two sections (or parts).
  • Take a set of hair on one side, and ...
  • Some people say: How to section you hair? Does taht sound unnatural as well? And does the "third sentence" sound "natural"? – It's about English May 27 '19 at 16:19
  • @It To me "How to section you hair? " does sound unnatural. When I hear "section" as a verb, i think "cut up" as in an autopsy or cutting an object apart. The 3rd sentence seems more natural to me, but I would prefer one of my examples. Mind you, the first two are not ungrammatical. – David Siegel May 27 '19 at 16:24
  • And what about: Take a small piece of hair. – It's about English May 27 '19 at 19:09
  • @It's about English To me, "a small piece of hair" would suggest a strand cut off. – David Siegel May 27 '19 at 19:44
  • And do you think that there might be natives that use the verb form of "section "? – It's about English May 27 '19 at 21:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.