0

I am having massive difficulty in trying to decipher if the following sentence whether is a past participle in the passive voice or past simple in the passive voice?

The woman was robbed yesterday.

  • 1
    Which one do you think is correct? How would the sentence look like if it was written in the other tense? What does a grammar book say? – virolino Jun 5 at 13:34
  • Was is a finite verb. English does not usually allow two finite verbs in the same clause. – Colin Fine Jun 5 at 14:07
0

As Colin Fine said, "was" is the main verb, so "was robbed" is the simple past tense. Specifically, the "robbed" in "was robbed" is a past participle, not a past simple. In this case the "robbed" past participle was used as an adjective.

My advice for someone learning English is to identify all words that could be verbs. The relative location of the possible verbs can help with identifying their tense.

Typically, "was + [verb]" or any other "[to-be] + [verb]" implies a different form of verbs. My suggestion is to look out specifically for [to-be] verbs (is, are, was, were, etc.) to help with identifying the tenses of other verbs.

One helpful table would be "The Full List of Tenses" in https://www.grammar-monster.com/glossary/tense.htm.

Source: https://www.grammar-monster.com/glossary/past_participles.htm

EDIT: changed "past progressive tense" (was robbing) to "simple past tense". Thanks 3kstc!

  • Jay, past progressive would be: she was robbing the bank. – 3kstc Jun 5 at 23:21
  • @3kstc Thanks! That was entirely my bad, I just saw the "was" and jumped the gun. I corrected it in my post – Jay Jun 6 at 17:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.