1

Someone is having a vision problem.(that person can't see clearly wity one eye)So what should be used:

I can't see with my left eye.

I can't see out of my left eye.

What would sound more natural and idiomatic?(which will be more likely to be used in day-to-day conversations?) And do my sentences give you a feelig of complete or partial blindness? (What can be used for both?)

I can bearly see with/out of my left eye.

I can't see clearly with /out of my left eye.

1
  • 2
    Both make sense to me. I wouldn't be surprised to hear either of them, and I would definitely understand them to mean the same thing. – pip install frisbee Jun 5 '19 at 19:03
2

These are both 100% valid, equally common, and mean the same thing.

The use of "out of" with an eye is a little bit more colloquial, while "with" would be something a more educated person (or a person with a more formal pattern of speech) might be slightly more likely to say.

I would tend to use "out of" in an all or nothing context

I can't see out of this eye at all

while I would be more likely to use "with" when being a bit more descriptive

Things are blurry when I look with only this eye

But either one works in either case. In normal speech I would be more likely to say "out of" most of the time, I think.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.