So basically I have no idea if these two sentences have any difference

  1. So it makes up for flaws in him
  2. So it makes up for flaws in his characteristic

If these are saying the same thing I'm happy cause I really don't know what the differences they have in meaning


"flaws in his characteristic" is an odd and unidiomatic phrase. I would use "flaws in his character". With that change the two examples have much the same meaning. Of course, both need context to indicate what "it" refers to.

| improve this answer | |

I think both sentences are a little unnatural. Here's a better way of saying it.

"So, that makes up for his personality flaws."

The two sentences written by you, although, unidiomatic, seem to have the same idea and meaning.

| improve this answer | |
  • "Character" and "personality" are both abstract nouns that talk about how a person relates to the world. "Character" is more "internal": Does the person persevere? Have good morals? Have good ethics? "Personality" is more about how the person interacts with other people: Is the person shy? Outgoing? A practical joker? – Jasper Jun 12 '19 at 0:46
  • What should I have there then, @David Siegel, just corrected me for using the word character in my example sentence. 😓 – Kaique Jun 12 '19 at 0:49
  • Your example sentence is fine, either way. We like to think that "character" is more important (in the long run) than "personality". If so, it should be easier for a positive "characteristic" to make up for a "personality" flaw than for a "character" flaw. – Jasper Jun 12 '19 at 1:08
  • "Characteristic" is a fairly general term. It can include physical traits like height, hair color, and speed, as well as aspects of one's character or personality. – Jasper Jun 12 '19 at 1:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.