-1

this post is discussing a programming problem.

the task is to draw some lines on the edge of 3 groups of data points.

enter image description here

rather than covering whole area.

enter image description here

is this expression "a polygon (concave) edge on a group of points" clear and idiomatic?

1

No, I wouldn't say it's clear. I didn't understand what it meant until I looked at the picture on Stackoverflow and saw that the edge of the polygon that was being pointed to by the arrow was bent inward, which is what 'concave' means.

Interestingly, they didn't need any additional words to make it clear. I would have used 'using' instead of 'with'.

How to draw a concave polygon edge on a group of points using Python?

  • Thanks for your answer, "... was bent inward" seems to be easier to understand. as for the choice of "with Python" or "using Python", I made this new post ell.stackexchange.com/q/215650/95456 – baojieqh Jun 22 at 6:15
  • That makes sense within the developer community. That's how we talk about coding languages in our work. But I think outside that community 'using' would be better. I'm think of how people who don't know what Python is would understand it. – dwilli Jun 22 at 17:30
0

Supplementary answer (I agree about "using Python"):

Clearer than "on a group of points" would be

How to draw a concave polygon surrounding a given group of points

"Given" is helpful because it helps the programmer understand that the points are part of the input.

Note, "concave" is a mathematical term and although the average layman might not understand it, and some programmers might not either, I think it is fair to use this term with programmers in a title. Then in the fine print one could explain the meaning.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.