0

As far as I know, we can use participles right before or after the subject of the main clause to give extra information about the subject. For example:

1- Dressed in his class-A uniform, the marine looked like a recruitment poster. (Original)

1a- The marine, who was dressed in his class-A uniform, looked like a recruitment poster.

2- Glazed with barbecue sauce, the rack of ribs lay nestled next to a pile of sweet coleslaw. (Original)

2a- The rack of ribs, which are glazed with barbecue sauce, lay nestled next to a pile of sweet coleslaw.

But I have seen sentences that use participles at the end of the main clause with a comma or a colon to give extra information about the subject of the main clause.

When I want to give extra information about the subject of the main clause, can I just use this form (main clause + colon or comma + participles) ? Would that be okay?

For example:

3- The funeral is at 3.00, followed by a reception at Shaw's bar. (Original)

3a- The funeral is at 3.00 and will be followed by a reception at Shaw's bar.

3b- The funeral is at 3.00, which will be followed by a reception at Shaw's bar. (I am not sure if this version is correct)

4- Essos is an immense landmass located to the east of Westeros, extending into the far east of the known world. (Original) (describes Essos)

4a- Essos is an immense landmass located to the east of Westeros and Essos extends into the far east of the known world.

4b- Essos is an immense landmass located to the east of Westeros which extends into the far east of the known world.

Improve this question
12
  • Is this an assignment of some sort?
    – BillJ
    Jun 26 '19 at 13:23
  • No :). I am just trying to learn how it works.
    – Talha Özden
    Jun 26 '19 at 13:32
  • You might find it more useful to "deconstruct" The funeral is at 3.00, followed by a reception at Shaw's bar as the "merging with deletion" of two statements: The funeral is at 3.00. The funeral is followed by a reception at Shaw's bar. I think that approach covers all your other examples: The marine was dressed in his class-A uniform. The marine looked like a recruitment poster. Sometimes we might want to explicitly convey the relationship between the two statements with a preposition: Because he was dressed in his class-A uniform, the marine looked like a recruitment poster.
    – FumbleFingers
    Jun 26 '19 at 16:11
  • Note that you can't delete the repeated subject from That makes him very happy and says this - it has to be ...and he says this.
    – FumbleFingers
    Jun 26 '19 at 16:17
  • @FumbleFingers Thank you. When I am allowed to use "merging with deletion" ? Is having the same subject in the main and participle clause enough to combine them into one sentence? + The sentence four looks different from the other examples. The subject of the participle clause is different from the main clause in that sentence.
    – Talha Özden
    Jun 26 '19 at 16:44
0

I'm just commenting, not answering. Sorry that I don't have 50 reputation yet. You may downvote me as you like.

This is wrong:

That makes him very happy and says this: "..."

It should be

That makes him very happy and he says this: "..."

Improve this answer
3
  • Thanks, I have edited. But you could have just used comment button.
    – Talha Özden
    Jun 26 '19 at 14:18
  • Actually, it's not wrong. It could also be saying That makes him very happy and [that] says this. The lack of the pronoun leaves the sentence ambiguous, but not ungrammatical. It would be a grammatically (if not stylistically) acceptable elision. (Dreams, or any thing or event, can be thought of as figuratively saying something.)
    – Jason Bassford
    Jun 26 '19 at 18:15
  • @JasonBassford: This makes me very happy and says that I'm easily pleased!
    – FumbleFingers
    Jun 27 '19 at 15:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.