“In particular, acting under orders caused participants to perceive a distance from outcomes that they themselves caused,” said study co-author Patrick Haggard, a cognitive neuroscientist at University College London, in an email.”

From https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/how-the-nazis-defense-of-just-following-orders-plays-out-in-the-mind

What is the difference between "act under" and "act according to"? If I change "acting under orders" to "acting according to orders" here, would any nuance be lost?

I originally asked the same question here (https://forum.wordreference.com/threads/act-under-according-to-orders.3589389/#post-18265641), but sadly I didn't get a valid answer. I hope you can help me.

Under: subject to the authority, control, guidance, or instruction of

According to: In conformity with (Merriam Webster)


It's a fine distinction, and most of the time we'd see the two forms as synonymous, but I think the difference is implied by the two definitions as cited by OP.

Generally speaking, if you're acting under order[s], the implication is you've been given a specific order to do whatever it is.

If you act in accordance / accord with orders, or according to orders, this could often simply mean that the way you're doing something doesn't break the rules (i.e. - is legitimate). You haven't necessarily been specifically instructed to do whatever it is.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.