0

What sounds natural in the sentences below:

My friend asked me what was I up to these days. I said:

Nothing. Though I was a few days earlier.

And here:

I used to like this dish earlier but I don't like it anymore.

He told be earlier that he was going to leave. (Can any word replace "earlier" here?)

The carnival started a few months earlier..

  • You have too many sentences to give a focused answer. Either reduce the number of possible words, or focus on just a single sentence. (There is no answer that can apply to all of them equally.) – Jason Bassford Jun 29 at 16:40
  • @JasonBassford I've edited it.. – It's about English Jun 29 at 16:56
0

I'm just going to address the first sentence.

Firstly, it would sound more natural to say a few days ago rather than a few days earlier when you're talking about time before the present. When you're telling a story about the past and you have to mention something that happened before that point in the past, then you have to use "earlier" instead.

Secondly, the content of the sentence doesn't make sense as an answer to the question "What are you up to?" It's not a yes-or-no question, so you can't just say "I am" or "I was"; you have to specify what you were up to (even if you were just up to "something.") So either of these could work:

"What are you up to these days?"

"Nothing. Though I was up to something a few days ago..."

or

"Are you up to anything these days?"

"No. Though I was a few days ago..."

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.