1

This is my sentence.

Religions assert things as fact.

Now I want to modify the object "things" with this phrase "that are not evidently true".

I know I could write it like this:

Religions assert things that are not evidently true as facts.

But if I want to place the phrase at the end of the sentence like this :

Religions assert things as facts that are not evidently true.

Would I need a comma between "facts" and "that"? Because if I don't use the comma, I feel that the phrase is modifying the word "facts", which is not what I am trying to do.

  • You don't need a comma. Both versions mean the same thing. In fact, if you used a comma, you'd end up with the interpretation you don't want: Religions assert things, as [because] facts are not evidently true. – Jason Bassford Supports Monica Jul 3 at 8:58
-2

First sentence is correct.

In the second one you should switch to

Religions assert things which are not evidently true as facts.

In the third example you can use:

Religions assert things as facts altough they are not evidently true.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.