0

In a series of adjectives about fields of study such as physical, mathematical, historical, philosophical etc. how would the field of engineering fit in?

I looked it up in one of my Danish-English dictionaries (Ordbogen.com) by translating a Danish equivalent word and found this translation:

ingeniørmæssig <-t, -e>
- engineerical: adjektiv - It is an engineerical wonder

Apparently, the word engineerical exists. But I am unable to find the description of that word in any native English dictionary online, such as Lexico by Oxford, Vocabulary or Dictionary. So, it doesn't seem officially recognised.

A Google search shows - apart from some Twitter and Youtube accounts - some results that do define it:

In "Build your own dictionary" by Meriam-Webster Word Central, a user defines it like this:

engineerical
Function: adjective
Definition: having great talent as an engineer: showing great skill in engineering
Example Sentence: That engineerical construction worker built an amazing tower.

The Urban Dictionary and Definithing define it like this:

Engineerical
Desription of a person who applies mathematical and scientific solutions to fix a problem.
I can not fix that machine. I am not engineerical.

This all indicates to me that this might be some "slang" word, if it exists at all. And frankly, the two shown definitions above are no entirely equivalent.

So, does this word not exist? My Danish-English dictionary is wrong? Is there an alternative I could use in the series mentioned, something that would make a sentence like the following sound proper:

The questions on the test can be physical, mathematical, historical or engineerical in nature.

Improve this question
4
  • 1
    The adjective for engineer is engineering. Your dictionary has a mistake. An engineering question [on the exam]. The Urban Dictionary is full of crap. :) Also, engineering construction is BS to qualify a worker. Why create junk when English has a perfectly good adjective??
    – Lambie
    Jul 14, 2019 at 15:43
  • @Lambie Ok, so can I write a a sentence like this: The questions on the test can be physical, mathematical, historical or engineering in nature.
    – Steeven
    Jul 14, 2019 at 15:45
  • The questions on the exam can be about physics, math, history or engineering. Physical is not the adjective for physics. Physics is: a physics question. engineering is an adjective and the activity. Engineering can be complicated, especially chemical engineering.
    – Lambie
    Jul 14, 2019 at 15:46
  • 1
    I dunno Lambie: "physical" is sometimes an adjective about physics. ..."American Physical Society"; "Physical Review", "the physical sciences", "Physical Chemistry".
    – Lorel C.
    Jul 14, 2019 at 15:56

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
3

It seems as if there really should be some common adjective to describe engineering things -- but, unlike so many other disciplines, there isn't. "Engineerical" is not a word, or at least not one you would use seriously.

There are several solutions to this deficit:

  1. (As per Lambie's suggestion) rewrite the sentence using nouns:

    The questions on the exam can be about physics, math, history, or engineering

  2. Use a semantically correct but stylistically awkward compound:

    The questions on the test can be physical, mathematical, historical, or engineering-related

  3. Use an awkward repeating term that nevertheless preserves parallelism:

    The questions on the test can be physics-related, math-related, history-related, or engineering-related

Note that the use of "physical" to mean "physics-related" may be confusing, as the more common uses are:

physical (adj):
1 Relating to the body as opposed to the mind.
    1.1 Involving bodily contact or activity.
2 Relating to things perceived through the senses as opposed to the mind; tangible or concrete.

Improve this answer
2
  • 1
    Agree. Physics is also called “physical science“ but the word “physical“ has so many possible meetings that it is ambiguous.
    – whiskeychief
    Jul 14, 2019 at 20:26
  • And, agreed: engineerical is not really recognized as a word in standard English.
    – whiskeychief
    Jul 14, 2019 at 20:28
1

I happen to think it's a perfectly cromulent word.

Improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .