[Using all of the profane German I had ever heard], I ordered him to come out.

I was watching an English grammar video which stated that the the above sentence contains a non-finite clause in the square brackets. It states that Using is the head verb and hence a gerund participle.

What I am confused about here is that, to me, I had ever heard is surely tensed? As such would this not make it a finite clause?


Using all of the profane German I had ever heard, I ordered him to come out.

The non-finite clause starts at: "using all of the profane German".

"The main verb has to be: Their main verb is either a to-infinitive [3], a bare infinitive [4], an -ed form [5], or an -ing form [6]:" The main verb for these purposes is defined as the first verb. That is "using" here.

non-finite clauses

Therefore, the non-finite clause is not "[that] I had ever heard". That is a complementizer clause, which is also subordinate to "using the most profane German":

Complement clauses They are introduced by a complementizer (that, whether, for). They are also referred to as noun clauses, nominal clauses, or completive clauses.

"[that] I have every heard" is a complement of "German". There is an implied "that" for purposes of grammatical analysis.

Types of embedded clauses

| improve this answer | |

[Using all of the profane German I had ever heard], I ordered him to come out.

"I had ever heard" is indeed tensed (finite) but it is a subordinate clause, more specifically a relative clause modifying the nominal "profane German". The subordinate clause is said to be 'embedded' because it is a dependent within the larger construction.

It is the bracketed matrix (main) clause that is non-finite since it has the non-finite verb "using" as head.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.