1

I'm trying to get my head round how we use so called invariable plurals. I have been through about a million different sites now, and come up with the following:

(i) There are three main groups of invariable plurals, namely

a) nouns denoting things (typically garments and tools) that consist of two or several conjoined parts, such as scissors, trousers, binoculars, tweezers etc

b) nouns denoting groups of living beings, such as police, people, cattle, vermin, personnel, clergy etc

c) miscellaneous nouns ending in -s, such as arms, fireworks, belongings, oats, valuables, regards, remains, clothes etc

(ii) All three kinds of invariable plural always take plural verb form (the binoculars were very expensive), always take plural demonstratives (these binoculars are expensive) and are always replaced by plural, rather than singular anaphoric pronouns (Did you see those binoculars? They were very expensive)

Now to my questions:

  1. Have I got things right so far? If not – where did I go wrong?

  2. Apart from impact on choices of verb form, demonstratives and anaphors, I'd also like to know whether invariable plurals are all countable (only there can never be just one) – that is, can we use cardinals (except one) and quantifiers that normally go only with countables (e.g. many and several) with all of them? If not, can we distinguish any kind of pattern?

  3. Is group (b) above distinct from what's generally referred to as collective nouns, or is it the same? If it's not the same, how do we tell them apart?

Thank you!

  • I may not have fully understood the question, but in BrE firework is the singular of fireworks and oat the singular of oats. For example "That firework is particularly beautiful" "The oat is called Avena sativa" – Peter Jennings Sep 14 '19 at 22:10
  • 1
    @PeterJennings, I think your oat example is a case similar to the case where mass nouns also have count noun forms with different meanings. The singular oat in your example, isn't the singular to the plural in "I fed the horse oats". – The Photon Sep 14 '19 at 23:34
  • On your question 3, group and team are both also collective nouns, and they are not invariably plural. – The Photon Sep 14 '19 at 23:42
  • @ThePhoton Possibly. But I can hold a seed in my hand and say "this is an oat", then point to a bag of seeds and say "those are oats". Wiktionary lists 41 English invariant nouns, oat / oats is not among them. – Peter Jennings Sep 14 '19 at 23:44
  • @ThePhoton and PeterJennings: Thank you both! About question 3 – perhaps one could say that they are all collective nouns, but that some collective nouns are invariably plural whereas others aren't then? – Hannah Sep 15 '19 at 7:22
0

I'd also like to know whether invariable plurals are all countable

Yes. This is resolved in English through the use of the phrase pair of:

I have three pairs of binoculars.

How many pairs of scissors do you have?

She took three pairs of my pants.

 

Is group (b) above distinct from what's generally referred to as collective nouns

Yes. If you can say X is a member of Y, then Y is a collective noun. You can't do this nonfiguratively with invariable plurals.

  • Thank you! What I meant was whether we can count them without using a partitive construction – that is, can we say five binoculars, many trousers, three cattle, a great many arms etc, just like we can say, for instance, ten/many people? Thanks! – Hannah Oct 25 '19 at 12:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.