What is the difference between part and a part?
What is the difference between these two sentences?

He was a part of the team.
He was part of the team.

I heard that part means a member and a part means a role (in a play or something). Is this right?

2 Answers 2


In this particular case, there is not any significant difference in meaning, but in other cases there may be.

To say "X is part of Y" means that X is some portion or element of Y, but normally not the whole of Y. For example:

Hydrogen is part of the substance of a star.

To say that "X is a part of Y" means that X is a discrete element or component of Y, often a part in the sense of one of the things to be assembled into Y. For example:

The trigger is a part of a pistol.

When the phrase is being used metaphorically, there is often little or no difference. For example:

  • Conflict is part of marriage.
  • Conflict is a part of marriage.

The meaning here is the same. Marriage is not a machine to be assembled from different parts, nor a simple mix with various ingredients like a soup, but a complex experience with many aspects, and the speaker is saying in either sentence that conflict is one of those aspects.

The form "a part" emphasizes that the thing referred to is or can be thought of as a unit among other units. So "He was a part of the team." says that he was one of several members of the team.

The form "part of" without "a" emphasizes the idea of being an aspect of or an ingredient of. So "He was part of the team." says that he was in the team, but not the whole of it, and suggests thinking of the team as a unified thing more than the other form.

These differences are subtle, and a casual fluent speaker may pick one form or the other without much considering such implications, and use either form to mean just "he was on the team" with no more detail.

  • It seems to me, given your explanation, that if I said "He was part of the team." rather than "He was a part of the team", I would convey that the person was more "part of us" or that the person was more integral to the team. I'm not a native speaker so I would like to know if my interpretation is correct. Thanks in advance. Jun 11, 2023 at 14:58

The original phrase goes like "to be (a) part of" which means "to be included or involved in".

Whether to use an article or not is optional unless we specifically require it.

There is also the construction "part of something" which means "some, but not all, of something" which tends to never follow an article.

In other cases "a part" always means a segment of something which makes up a whole when combined with the other segments.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .