0

“In the period we not enter, Romanticism, the Account became the preeminent formula for literary production.”

In the sentence above, does the ‘not’ make sense? Should I use ‘don’t’ instead?

  • 3
    I suspect that "not" is a typo for "now" or perhaps "next", but without the source, cannot confirm this. – David Siegel Sep 18 '19 at 4:21
  • 3
    Mantra, where is this from? Did you write it? What is the context? – AIQ Sep 18 '19 at 4:21
  • 1
    I'm almost certain this is a typo for now, as suggested by @DavidSiegel. It's certainly not grammatical as it stands. – Colin Fine Sep 18 '19 at 5:57
  • The sentence, even after books4languages correction, still doesn't make sense. What is the "Account" a story, a novel, a romance? And why do we not enter the Romanticism period? – Mari-Lou A Sep 19 '19 at 10:17
  • Please, in the future, provide more context in your posts. Where did you find it? What's the context? etc. See Details, Please and the Contributor's Guide (Asking) for more tips and examples. – Em. Sep 22 '19 at 9:11
1

You cannot have 'not' + verb in this sentence. It is better to write:

“In the period that we do not (don't) enter, Romanticism, the Account became the preeminent formula for literary production.”

You can see more about this rule here: https://open.books4languages.com/english-a1-grammar/chapter/present-simple-negative/

  • Thank you. You see, that sentence was written by my literature professor. I thought something looked odd, and indeed, it is not properly written. – Mantra. Sep 18 '19 at 12:11

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.