0

As you know the verb "to replace somebody / something" means "to take the place of somebody / something" or "to supersede somebody / something." I was wondering what form is correct in the following sentences? If both are correct, then what is the meaning of each sentence if I want to paraphrase them?

Example 1:

The previous teacher is a little old and cannot manage to come to the school on a daily basis and now:

1.a. I'm being replaced with him.
1.b. I am replacing with him.

For more clarification, let me bring up another example:

Example 1:

2.a. In modern life, email has been replaced the traditional business letter.
2.b. In modern life, email has replaced the traditional business letter.

Note: as we know, the verb "replace" is a transitive verb. So it cannot be used in a passive tone. These all are confusing me a little! Maybe I am missing something here!

1

"Replace" is, as you say, a transitive verb, and therefore can be used in the passive:

A replaces B

B is replaced by A.

It can also be used as a causative verb:

C replaces B with A (eg My boss wants to replace me with a machine!)

B is replaced by C with A. (eg That poster is being replaced by the creative director, with this new one. A comma is not always necessary in this structure, but often makes it clearer)

Your 1a and 2b make sense. Your 1b and 2a are incoherent.

  • It seems to be an excellent answer and perhaps what I need @Colon Fine, but I cannot understand the role of the C and the meaning of "by" / "with" in causative form! I'm absolutely confused. Please kindly simplify / paraphrase these strictures. – A-friend Sep 18 at 9:43
  • @A-friend: I've added some examples: does that help? – Colin Fine Sep 18 at 11:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.