0

It is clear that "woods" is semantically plural, but what about gramatically? Can it be both singular and plural, as other collective nouns ? Example:

  • The woods of this town contain many secrets.
  • The woods of this town contains many secrets.
  • I think it's singular (a mass noun) but there may be exceptions. – marcellothearcane Sep 30 at 15:49
  • The woods around this town contain many secrets. – FumbleFingers Sep 30 at 15:57
  • 1
    Generally, we'd say have and not contain here. And we wouldn't say: the woods of this town. We'd say near this town, around this town, etc. or the town in these woods. – Lambie Sep 30 at 16:04
  • One particularly well-known example is Winnie-the-Pooh's Hundred Acre Woods - always written using the "plural" form in A. A. Milne's original text, but searching for written instances of "the hundred acre wood / woods is / are [blah blah]" in Google Books, I see some people feel compelled to switch it to "singular" wood to tone down the awkwardness of the apparent noun/verb "plurality clash". – FumbleFingers Sep 30 at 16:18
  • See “Woods” and then verb. Singular or plural?. Also, it's not at all clear that woods is semantically plural. The plural formation is still often used to describe a singular object. I think what you meant to say is that the word, purely on its own, is syntactically plural. – Jason Bassford Supports Monica Oct 6 at 3:45
0

I believe the answer to your question should be "The woods near the town contain many secrets."

Cambridge Dictionary calls "woods" a "plural noun", with the example "Shaded from the sun, the woods were cool and quiet."

wiktionary.org is more cautious: "usually in the plural, sometimes singular" and "Woods more often takes a plural verb (determiner, etc, as in these woods are) than a singular verb (as in this woods is)."

There is an interesting and apropos comment on english.stackexchange.com:

It gets trickier when there's an adjective. Although I can find both of these constructions in Google books, I wouldn't say a small woods (because it's plural), or some small woods (because mass nouns don't work that way; you can't say some small rice either). I'd say a small stretch of woods or a large expanse of woods. – Peter Shor

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.