0

I read a sentence in Word by Word by Kory Stamper which was:

We must turn to the dictionary for answers to these questions. What does "vulgar" mean when used of words?

I strongly believe that there should've been "for" instead of "of" in the latter sentence. But the excerpt is from a lexicographer's book so I doubt my take.

1

Kory Stamper is a careful writer, as her occupation, and the theme of her book, would suggest. I don't know if the same question asked on English Stack Exchange makes this a 'duplicate' - however the verdict in that case was that it's an OK usage, not poor writing, but more usual in UK than American English.

As an answer to that question said, Oxford Dictionaries have no qualms about using it:

The word was used of Irish peasants dispossessed by English settlers and living as robbers, and extended to other marauders especially in the Scottish Highlands. (Definition of Tory).

Does "to be used OF" mean "to be used FOR"?

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    In this context, "of" means "about" in the sense of "to describe". – Valkor Oct 4 '19 at 19:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.