0

I am not a native speaker of English. I wonder whether using "it" to talk about something in a general tone is weird. In the example down below I use "it" to talk about "a tiger", not any specific tiger. I don't know if it is correct or not. Maybe it is grammatically correct but sounds weird.

For example:

Kid: What is a tiger?

Me: A tiger is a large animal that feeds by hunting other animals. It is ferocious and smart..........

2

Yes, it can be used like this:

Me: A tiger is a large animal that feeds by hunting other animals. It [the tiger] is ferocious and smart.......

Because animals are often referred to as it.

Animals can also be he or she in specific contexts.

That [female] tiger is ferocious. She doesn't seem to like the other tigers.

That [male] tiger is ferocious. He doesn't seem to like the other tigers.

| improve this answer | |
1

That is correct, but if you're talking about tigers in general, it would likely sound better to use "they are ferocious and smart...".

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    When you are talking about some group of things in general, it is acceptable and fairly common to single out a non-specific individual (which could be any member of the group) and discuss that member (any member) as a representative of the group (all members). Exactly like in the question: "A tiger is a large animal that feeds by hunting other animals. It is ferocious and smart." – Lorel C. Oct 22 '19 at 15:04
  • I identified it as correct. The asker said it sounded off, so I suggested an alternative. – JRodge01 Oct 22 '19 at 15:11
  • The OP has used the articles super correctly, actually. – Lambie Oct 22 '19 at 15:49
1

Here what a tiger is is being described.

What is a tiger?

A tiger is a large animal that feeds by hunting other animals. It is ferocious and smart.

A tiger refers to tigers in general but not about a single tiger.?It refers to tiger. we use it for an animal when we are not particular about its gender.since it is a tiger. we may use he for a tiger and she for a tigress though.

A tiger is a large animal.It is ferocious.

The above sentences mean:

Tigers are large animals. They are ferocious.

I think the above question and the definition are correct.There is nothing weird about the use of it or a tiger

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.