3

This discovery was to have a major effect on the treatment of heart disease.

Does was to have mean supposed or destined in this sentence?

Improve this question
1
  • In practice, the "purpose" sense (supposed, intended) would be very unlikely with your exact text (apart from anything else, "discoveries" aren't usually "planned", so they're not usually made with a goal in mind). But you'd have to provide more context to get a definitive answer.
    – FumbleFingers
    Oct 29, 2019 at 13:15

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1

No, was to have doesn't mean 'supposed' or 'destined' in this case, it is merely the standard way of talking about an event in the past without using past tense for the whole sentence.

Improve this answer
1
  • 3
    Specifically, the future of an event in the past!
    – whiskeychief
    Oct 29, 2019 at 17:34

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .