I am learning English with Duolingo.
One example sentence is:
The forks are on the plates.
Another one is:
I have her fork in my plate.
What's the difference between "in the plate" and "on the plate"?
English Language Learners Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for speakers of other languages learning English. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityI am learning English with Duolingo.
One example sentence is:
The forks are on the plates.
Another one is:
I have her fork in my plate.
What's the difference between "in the plate" and "on the plate"?
The literal sense is...
plate - a shallow, usually circular dish, often of earthenware or porcelain, from which food is eaten.
It's not always possible to classify any given item as a plate or a bowl, but the general principle is that plates are flat surfaces, so food (or anything else) goes on them. In contrast, bowls are (also usually circular) containers with raised sides - capable of holding liquids such as soup, which goes in them.
Thus OP's example usage #1 is what we would normally expect when describing the spatial relationship between the forks and the plates.
But note the figurative sense #2 in my link - the contents of such a dish; plateful, and consider this
"Someday, I hope you'll mean that," she replied, sticking her fork in his plate for a quick taste.
As a native speaker, my natural inclination is to interpret OP's second example in terms of that second definition (she sticks her fork into the food on his plate, in order to help herself to some of it).
TL;DR: Things are usually located on plates (including the figurative "I had too much on my plate already to take on another task" as per the idiomatic sense 34 in my link above). Usages such as "Lindsey stopped eating and set her fork in her plate." are relatively uncommon, so native speakers may well look for an alternative interpretation to explain/justify the unusual preposition.
I think that, over the past few years at least, plates have become less flat, that is, with more elevated sides. Maybe because of the variety of cuisines--more liquids for example--a deeper plate has been desirable. The top outside edge of our white plates at home is 1" above the bottom edge, for example. That's not flat, not like our heavy brown dishes. That's enough for me to start to think of food as being in the white plates but still on the brown ones. So the more that plates resemble bowls, the more likely it is that English speakers will instinctively start to say, "in the plate" instead of "on the plate," etc.
If a plate is has higher sides to it then it is a shallow bowl not a plate. As a Native English Speaker O have always said on the plate and in the bowl. Agreed that if a person said they put their fork in his plate it would assume that it was into his food .. If you said the fork was on the plate you would assume some sort of art work whereby the fork was embedded in the plate