What made us really believe we could start a band was seeing the flatmates when they started.

I don't understand very well the reason for the past continuous "was seeing" in this sentence. I don't think in this case it means the action was in progress; I think it means that the author saw the flatmates playing many times during and after the flatmates started. Am I right?


What's confusing you is that this is not a past continuous construction.

In English, the gerund can be used to form a past continuous with "was":

 He was walking down the street, minding his own business, when the grapefruit hit him.

However, it can also be used to create a verbal noun:

His hobby is sitting.

If we are talking about the past, we might form the past tense with "was":

John was a lazy bastard; his hobby was sitting.

But that doesn't change the fact that "sitting" is acting as a verbal noun. It is not a past continuous.

In the same way, your sentence is using "seeing" as part of a verbal noun phrase. For example: if you were to say:

What inspired us was heroin.

"Heroin" is a noun, the object of the sentence, and the verb in the sentence is "was."

Similary, when you say:

What inspired us was listening.

"Listening" is a verbal noun formed with a gerund, and the verb is still "was," not "was listening."

Tack on a prepositional phrase:

What inspired us was listening to our flatmates

"Listening to our flatmates" is a verbal noun phrase. There's no implication of continuous action here; the verb is the simple past "was."

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.