I used to think that when quality refers to the standard of something, it is a mass noun. However, a sentence I saw the other day complicated the issue. It reads like this:

"Using this definition, the World Bank works towards improving quality of life through neoliberal means, with the stated goal of lowering poverty and helping people afford a better quality of life."

I have three questions, and they all boil down the question of the countability of the word "quality".

  1. In the text above, shouldn't it be "improving the quality of life"?

  2. Why is there an indefinite article in "afford a better quality of life"?

  3. I wrote a sentence a couple of days ago, but now that I am confused about the usage of "quality", I am not sure whether I used it the right way in my sentence:

"Higher income leads to increased purchasing capacity and enhanced quality of life."

Should I add an indefinite article prior to "enhanced quality of life"? In other words, should it instead be "and an enhanced quality of life"?

2 Answers 2


This is very simple:

The quality of life in X is high. Non-countable. In that specific place.

The qualities she exhibits at work are trust inspiring. countable. Those particular qualities.

Qualities we like in candidates are complicated. no the, countable but also "abstract"/

Finally, abstract nouns do not need articles in English.

  • Wealth can be a measure of prosperity.
  • Goodness is hard to find.
  • Quality of life is not easy to define.
  • Poverty in x is problem.

In your context,it is uncountable and "abstract". So, the World Bank text is correct.


Do not descend into insanity contemplating the usage of English articles. As I have had occasion to point out before, these are some of the oldest words in the English language, coming to us directly from Old English. They have thus had over a millennium to develop many and various idiomatic usages - the OED finds over twenty categories of usage for the alone -- and for many of which the reasons are lost.

First of all, you are correct that the word quality is noncountable in the phrase "quality of life" meaning an enjoyable standard of existence. It is possible to say

There are three qualities of life.

But here qualities would be understood to refer to individual characteristics of living things.

The first question is why the definite article is an option. That is, we can talk about "quality of life" and also "the quality of life." The second question is why the indefinite article is also an option, that is, we can additionally talk about "an enhanced quality of life."

I believe the answers to the two questions are related and best answered in reverse order. I think it's well understood that different people have different judgments about what constitutes quality of life, and one person's acceptable standard might be intolerable to another. So while quality of life is a nondivisible standard, it isn't a unified universal, since there are many judgments about quality of life. So you can write generally and without an article

Higher income leads to increased purchasing capacity and enhanced quality of life.

but you might also be talking specifically about one aspect of life, material well being, which you may also identify with the indefinite article as one out of a set of aspects:

Higher income leads to increased purchasing capacity and an enhanced quality of life.

Perhaps a higher income does nothing for another aspect, say one's spiritual quality of life.

Now on to the first question, the one about the definite article. The ordinary usage is to designate a particular thing, e.g.,

Pride and Prejudice is the novel I read last week.

and this usage is inapt with a noncountable noun. But the definite article is also used with a singular noun when that noun represents its class as a characteristic member. Thus

We are studying the English novel next semester.

Not one, but many novels, possibly including Pride and Prejudice. In the same way, the quality of life represents the spectrum of judgments about the various judgments of quality.

It is also worth noting that nouns followed by prepositions, particularly of, attract an optional definite article. The OED finds the example

The Oxford of 1850 was an inhospitable locale.

That is Oxford (the city) in 1850 was full of cold and unfeeling people, but neither then nor now would we say

*I live in the Oxford.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .