0

A newspaper is the only kind of reading that is almost universal

How do we understand this sentance in terms of grammar ?

This has a meaning :

  • A newspaper is the only kind of reading for almost universal
  • There are things that almost people read and it is the only one, newspaper.

Hence in my thought,

  • A newspaper is the only kind + almost universal is reading
  • A newspaper is the only kind of reaing that almost universal is

Hence please, why is the order of almost universal and is changed ?

3
  • 1
    Are you sure you haven't omitted the before only? The sentence would make sense with that addition. Feb 11 '20 at 10:37
  • Thank you for your correction.
    – HK Lee
    Feb 11 '20 at 10:39
  • 1
    OK. There are many kinds of reading [matter]. Only one kind is almost universal. A newspaper is that one. Feb 11 '20 at 11:02
1

The adverb "almost" is qualifying the word it precedes - "universal" - to mean that it is "not quite universal", or "very nearly universal".

Without "almost", the sentence would be a very sweeping statement that suggests everybody in the whole world reads newspapers - and that is simply not true.

Saying that reading newspapers is almost universal allows for the fact that some people do not read newspapers, and maybe a few countries or even cultures are exceptions to that rule. As written, it seems a reasonable statement that reading newspapers is closer to being universal than other kinds of reading.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .