We all agreed from the get-go that we were not going to parody- as Lou had for 20 years .

Why "had" past simple: does it mean that the reformation of the group came before the duration was over,before Lou stopped to parody(as like a synonymous of while)

or does the author did not want to emphasize the duration ( this part of the sentence was not very important) I think this the right explaination

  • 1
    Actually, it can be read as: as Lou had [done] for 20 years. A native speaker "fills that in". – Lambie Mar 1 at 16:45
  • ok this kind of "structure", does it happen often? In which other cases can you do the same ? – user5577 Mar 1 at 21:45
  • We loved the game as she had [loved the game] in the past.

    • We admired the players as we also had [admired them] in the past.

    • We played piano this year as they had [played piano] last year.

    • We were saying so just then as we had been [saying so] all along.

I'm too tired to formulate an actual rule as I usually do in this forum.

Repetition of the main verb is often avoided after as since the auxiliary works just fine.

Here is a general reference on non-repetition of the main verb.

non-repetition or ellipsis of the main verb

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.