0

I read a lot of explanations about the uses of the definite article, but it sort of made me more confused instead of clarifying about what I had in mind:

In a given story which takes place in a fictional world, there is a place called Sky Shrine. In that world there’s no other shrine in the sky, or another place with the same name to consider. What would be correct to say: “I’m going to Sky Shrine” or “I’m going to the Sky Shrine”?

And (the root of my doubt), considering the given context, if I would name the chapter or the whole story with this place’s name, what would fit better: “Sky Shrine” or “The Sky Shrine”, or is it a style choice? Would be “The Sky Shrine” incorrect?

What would be the difference if Animal Farm by George Orwell was called The Animal Farm instead?

1
  • 1
    Animal Farm=title. I'm going to an/the animal farm.
    – Lambie
    Mar 4 '20 at 20:34
1

In general, when the name of a thing includes what that thing is, we use “the”:

  • the Empire State Building (a building)
  • the Eiffel Tower (a tower)
  • the Suez Canal (a canal)
  • the Three Gorges Dam (a dam)

So, if your “Sky Shrine” is a shrine, you should use “the”. If it’s something other than a shrine, you shouldn’t.

However, this is a very loose rule with many exceptions, so if it’s a name you made up, you can decide whether it follows the rule without being objectively wrong either way.

0

I don't know that there is a universal rule here, however, I would lean towards using "the" as man-made structures frequently use it.

  1. The Empire State Building
  2. The Vatican
  3. The Taj Mahal

However, there are plenty of examples that don't use it. 1. I went to Wrigley Field to watch the Cubs play 2. I go to church at Saint John The Baptist Catholic Church

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.