0

Why do we use would in the following sentence?. Can we replace the would with "it burns your fingers"

A hot potato is definitely something you don’t want to hold with your bare hands for a long time, because it would burn your fingers

1

A hot potato is definitely something you don’t want to hold with your bare hands for a long time, because it would burn your fingers.

This is a conditional sentence that states a condition that will cause a specific result. Use of the simple present "it burns" states something is happening now, not might/probably/will happen. This if/then construction proposes the consequence given the stated condition, not a present action.

"Holding a hot potato too long burns my fingers" is a statement of present action.

"If I hold a hot potato too long, it will/would burn my fingers" is a conditional sentence offering "if this, then that" information.

If a time is set in the conditional, then the present tense would be used: "When I hold a hot potato too long, it burns my fingers."

| improve this answer | |
  • too difficult to understand. could you simplify please? – santhosha Mar 26 at 12:16
  • Simply, the answer to your question is "no" the present tense "burns" is not used in this conditional sentence. Use "would" when a condition is given for a result when no time is specified. – Katherine Mar 26 at 12:21
  • Can you please provide one similar sentence to support your answer. It would be easy for me to get the essence of your answer – santhosha Mar 26 at 12:28
  • 1
    "If you do this, then that would happen. When you to this, that happens" – Katherine Mar 26 at 12:33
  • This comment is more useful than the whole answer!. Thanks a ton – santhosha Mar 26 at 12:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.