As a native speaker, which of the following sentences flows?

I would get this done by him.

I would have him do it.

I've seriously never read the first one in any literature piece. Therefore, I feel that native speakers prefer the second one, or else there should be some usages of the first one.

  • 1
    Are you looking for answers only from native speakers? If yes, why? – AIQ May 8 '20 at 0:48
  • @ AIQ anyone with good knowledge can answer of course. Natives usually tell what their usual way of speaking is, rather than taking help from books. – xeesid May 8 '20 at 7:06
  • 1
    I would get him to do it. - A possible alternative to the former with the meaning "persuade someone to do something", whereas your variant means 'cause something to be done by somebody else'. Besides, I would omit "by him" in your the first sentence. – Alex TheBN May 18 '20 at 11:46
  • 1
    @AlexTheBN Your comment is, by far, the best answer for the question actually asked. – jwpfox Nov 28 '20 at 3:35

The latter - I would have him do it. is definitely the preferred in my experience.

The former - I would get this done by him. - if it is ever used at all, would be more appropriate for cases where you are emphasizing which of multiple parties might be chosen (as in, I would get this done by him, not by that other guy). Even then, that's a stretch. The latter would probably also be better in this case as well.

  • Tend to disagree here. The causative use of HAVE seems to be a recently evolved one. People used to be surprised at the use of 'have someone do'. "have" usually followed by the third form of verb", often worked like, "have it cleared; have it typed; have it posted' etc. It confused them to decide the correctness of say, "Have him selected...." and "Have him select..." The meaning changes entirely. However, the saviour 'causative use of HAVE' did work. – Ram Pillai May 18 '20 at 9:40
  • How, if one is to believe that "I would get this done by him, not by that other guy...", similar change can be made in the previous one too, like, 'I would have him do it, not '...her do it...." . I have seen get something done, have something done etc. more idiomatic than have something/ someone do..., though both might be acceptable in the name of evolving English. – Ram Pillai May 18 '20 at 9:44
  • @RamPillai causative "have" dates at least as far back as 19th century. – Maciej Stachowski Jul 29 '20 at 20:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.