0
  1. The principal gave Martha an award.
  2. The principal gave an award to Martha.

Many grammar sites (e.g. www.k12reader.com) say that Martha in the first sentence is an Indirect Object and Martha in the second sentence is an object of preposition.

If it is so, to Martha in the second sentence is a prepositional phrase. Then, my question is: what function does this prepositional phrase do in the sentence?

  • 1
    It is a complement of the verb gave: its function is identical to Martha in the first sentence. I would still call it an indirect object. – Colin Fine May 16 at 7:48
  • @ColinFine, do you mean it takes a double role - the Indirect Object of the verb gave and the object of the preposition to? – mahmud k pukayoor May 16 at 8:02
  • 1
    In your second example the preposition phrase "to Martha" functions not as indirect object but as complement of "gave". – BillJ May 16 at 11:14
  • @BillJ thank you. If you post it as an answer, I will accept it. – mahmud k pukayoor May 16 at 11:20
1

[1] The principal gave Martha an award.

[2] The principal gave an award to Martha.

In [1] "Martha" is related directly to the verb "gave" and thus is the indirect object.

But in [2] "Martha" is related to the verb only indirectly, via the preposition "to", and thus is not an indirect object of the verb, but the object of the preposition "to". The PP "to Martha" functions as complement of "gave".

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.