Why there is no definite article before "claims' in the following sentence? Does the that-clause after the plural noun 'claims' in the following sentence make it specific? Or is the noun still generic even though it has been qualified by a that-clause? Can I use the definite article here? How will the meaning change?

The union denied claims that it would call off the agitation.

Please explain.


Because the that clause is not a relative clause, but a complement of claims.

What was claimed? That it would call off the agitation.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.