1

1.Results indicated positive paths from A to B, B to C, and C to A and B.

2.Results indicated positive paths from A to B, from B to C, and from C to A and B.

Which of the above sentences is considered grammatically correct? Is it necessary to repeat "from" after the comma and/or the conjunction "and"?

I'd like to know what would be considered correct in American English, if it makes any difference.

4
  • They often make it easier to understand, and sometimes they resolve ambiguity. Commented Jun 25, 2020 at 7:42
  • It is good style to use parallel constructions. Roughly, if you do a thing multiple times in a sentence, prefer to do it the same way. skidmore.edu/writing_guide/terms/parallel.php
    – BadZen
    Commented Aug 10, 2023 at 14:24
  • No, you do not need to repeat the preposition from
    – Lambie
    Commented Dec 8, 2023 at 16:39
  • It would be better expressed with a list, table, or even a diagram. Just because something's grammatical doesn't mean it's good writing.
    – Stuart F
    Commented Dec 3 at 20:30

1 Answer 1

1

Grammatically they are both fine.

The second one is longer to write, but is a little easier to read and understand.

One could even repeat the "to": "and from C to A and to B".

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .