0

The Second Conditional is used to express something that is unlikely to happen and it can only refer to future events. According to this explanation I don’t really get these two sentences below, even though they sound fine to me.

An UFC fighter, after defeating his opponent said: “I said I’d punish him”. I assume the fighter said that because he had a feeling of what -would had happened, right?-

I never thought Trump would win.

Both sentences refer to past events.

Can anyone help me get a better understanding (figure it out/sort it out/clear my head/get my head straight)?

  • It's future in the past, not conditional – Son Nguyen Jun 28 at 18:41
1

These are not conditional.

As well as its use as a modal in its own right, would has a second use (its historical origin, in fact), as the past of the modal will.

Both of these are reported speech, with backshifting:

I'll punish him -> I said I'd punish him.

Trump will win -> I never thought Trump would win.

| improve this answer | |
  • Neither is necessarily reported speech. It is the past of the modal will. – Lambie Jun 28 at 20:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.