1). Without my coach it wouldn't be possible.

2). Without my coach it will not be possible.

What is the difference in meaning between these two sentences???

I Know that "would" is used in hypothetical sentences, what might be the unstated hypothetical condition in the first sentence.

  • It's not unstated. The hypothetical condition is the absence of the coach. In the first, the most likely interpretations are that it will be possible or it is possible, because the coach will be or has been present. In the second, one likely interpretation is that it will not be possible if the coach doesn't arrive. Jul 10 '20 at 1:58

As you say, the first is hypothetical (grammarians say irrealis or counter-factual).

Without my coach it wouldn't be possible => If I didn't have my coach it wouldn't be possible, but I do have it.

The second is an unknown possibility, but is not counter-factual, or irrealis:

Without my coach it won't (will not) be possible => If I don't have my coach at the relevant time, it will not be possible (and I don't know if I will have my coach then or not).

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .