”Have you eaten all the cake THAT I made yesterday?”

”That” in this sentence is a relative pronoun that introduces the relative clause (I made yesterday), if I’m not mistaken. But what part of speech is ”that”? In dictionaries I find it under ”conjunctions”; is this correct? Are relative pronouns conjunctions and not pronouns?

  • Relative "that" is actually a subordinator, the same one that introduces declarative content clauses. – BillJ Jul 9 at 17:33
  • 'Subordinator' is its part of speech. In traditional grammar it's called a subordinating conjunction. Note that "that" is definitely not a relative pronoun: see my answer and that of user178049 – BillJ Jul 9 at 18:44

Traditionally it is analyzed as a relative pronoun (a subclass of noun). However, it is now considered a subordinator.

Traditional grammar analyses the that which introduces relative clauses as a relative pronoun, comparable to which and who, but we believe that there is a good case for identifying it with the subordinator that which introduces declarative content clauses (Huddleston & Pullum, 2002: 1056).

This classification is based on four reasons, one of which is the lack of upward percolation. "Which", for example, allows a preposition to be fronted; this is called 'upward percolation' : eg. "This is the knife [with which I cut it]".

With the subordinator "that", this is clearly impossible; hence, the ungrammaticality of *"This is the knife [with that I cut it].

Note also that relative pronouns "which" and "who" inflect for the genitive case ("whose"), and the subordinator "that" does not.

| improve this answer | |

Have you eaten all the cake [THAT I made ___ yesterday?]

"That" is not a relative pronoun but a subordinator. https://simple.wiktionary.org/wiki/that

It's the same subordinator that introduces declarative content clauses, as in Ed told me that he had passed his exam.

There are a number of reasons why it's not a pronoun, one of which is that it has no genitive form and it never occurs as complement of a preposition.

For example, the patients to whom the letter was sent is grammatical but *the patients to that the letter was sent is of course not.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.