Could you tell me if the word for adds anything to the meaning in the following context. It's from the sixth episode of the tenth season of Friends.

Chandler: Look, I'm sorry I didn't give them your tape. And I promise, next time to submit you whether I think you are right for the part or not.

Joey: That's not the point Chandler. The point is that you lied.

Chandler: I know. You're right. What's it gonna take for you to forgive me.

How the meaning would change if Chandler dropped the for?

  • It takes x for [someone] to do something – Lambie Jul 11 '20 at 19:01

This is the type of situation where you can't omit 'for' as a preposition when it is followed by an indirect object and to-infinitive. If you do so, your sentence will be meaningless.

Moreover, the structure for + noun/pronoun [here, it is the subject of the to-infinitive clause] + to-infinitive is very common in English, and in speech. It is therefore needed ,as I mentioned before, in order to complete the intended meaning of the aforementioned sentence.

The sentence makes sense, and is correct as it is.

I hope I provided a good explanation.

  • This is an idiom: what's it going to take [for some person to do y] – Lambie Jul 11 '20 at 18:56
  • Probably. But It shouldn't be modified anyhow. – Alex TheBN Jul 11 '20 at 18:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.