0

I am confused as to what the passive voice of the "No sooner.... than" construction would be. For example: No sooner did he reach the station than the train started

In my opinion, the answer might be " No sooner was the station reached by him, the train started"?

  • You forgot to include than in your examples! Your version is an example of the passive voice, but I don't know why anyone would ever want to say it that way. – Kate Bunting Jul 26 at 15:25
  • @Kate bunting, yep sorry I forgot to add "than". I was just curious regarding the usage of passive voice in general, not that I actually wanted to use it that way. This passive construction is what had me ponder over for quite some time. – SANTOSH KUMAR Jul 26 at 19:01
  • This is not passive. It is a stylistic inversion of reach: He no sooner reached the station than the train started. Same thing. When a sentence starts with certain adverbs, you can use a form like that. no sooner, no longer – Lambie Jul 26 at 19:43
  • Here is a list of adverbs often used in inversions: perfect-english-grammar.com/inversion.html – Lambie Jul 26 at 20:32
  • 1
    //No sooner did he reach the station than the train started.// Here, the verbs are 'reach' and 'start', and these are used here intransitively. We cannot make passives of intransitive verbs, but of only transitive verbs. – Ram Pillai Aug 19 at 3:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.