Let's look at the context.

Would you go if she called you?

Yeah. I might go.

Is it correct to use 'might' here rather than 'might have'? I think here 'might' is used as the past form of 'may'. Right?


Yes, it's correct to use might.

It's a way of saying: **Yes I might go if she called me.

Might have is a short form of might have gone.

This answer would be correct if the question had been:

Would you have gone if she had called you?
Yes, I might have (gone).

This is a question in the hypothetical past - what might have happened if a situation had arisen. You will find lots of examples if you google it.

  • The sentence 'would you go if she called you' is a conditional sentence that refers to the present we are imagining. Right? – Sahil Laskar Jul 27 '20 at 17:15
  • I doubt the OP was asking about the hypothetical past, rather about the "might have to" form. Otherwise you are totally right in your answer. – SovereignSun Jul 29 '20 at 16:24

The difference between

  • I might go.
  • I might have to go.

Is the following:

  1. I might go - Means that there is a possibility that I will go.
  2. I might have to go - Means that there might occur a reason for me to go.
  • 1
    The first implies whether you go is your choice. The second implies whether you go is not your choice. – Gort the Robot Jul 30 '20 at 4:08
  • @GorttheRobot Right, but not all right! In the second sentence you still have a choice not to go although you have to. – SovereignSun Jul 30 '20 at 4:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.