They were still in a position of great peril, since they could not expect to embark and cross the stream without suffering tremendous loss from the enemy before whom they would be flying.



The meaning of "fly" here is this one:

American Heritage Dictionary "fly'
intransitive verb: c. To flee; escape.

The meaning of "before" here is simply "in front of", that is they were confronted by their enemy, who were pursuing them.

So, the phrase "the enemy before whom they would be flying" means "the enemy they would be running away from."

The verb form "would be flying" is used because the sentence contains an implied conditional, that is, it has an "if" condition that is not explicitly stated in the sentence. In this sentence. The implied "if" condition can be stated: "if they embarked and crossed the stream". If they did that, then they would have losses from the enemy.

For other examples of implied conditionals, see here:
mikeandcate "implied conditional"

| improve this answer | |
  • What is the usage of "would be + verb(ing)? when we use of this structure? – Hamed Targitay Aug 3 at 10:06
  • @HamedTargitay Thank you for the question. I added a paragraph to my posted answer to respond to it. – Jack O'Flaherty Aug 3 at 14:27
  • Is this correct? If they had embarked and crossed the streem, then they would have losses from the enemy. – Hamed Targitay Aug 3 at 16:59
  • Yes, that's correct for a simple statement about the past. The form "if they embarked" is from a perspective of "future in the past", that is, the dilemma from their perspective at the time. – Jack O'Flaherty Aug 3 at 18:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.