0

I was preparing a title and I had decided to go with Oh, no! Stumbled upon the void?

since its a title for the web that I decided to go without the "Did you stumble" part.

But when I looked up in the dictionary I understood that stumble upon doesn't convey the meaning.

Definition of stumble across/on/onto/upon : to find or learn about (something) unexpectedly I stumbled across/on/upon this book by chance. We stumbled onto/across the ruins of an old fort. They stumbled on/upon a bizarre plot. He stumbled onto the truth.

So is there a better way than to say Oh, no! Stumbled upon the void?

10
  • This is not a creative writing site. Sorry. – Lambie Aug 3 '20 at 18:56
  • 2
    Hi Sandeep, It's just that it's a style question, which is a matter of opinion and therefore not encouraged here, unfortunately. . It's fine as far as the grammar goes, But I am not sure it's a good title....Personally, I don't like titles that leave out bits of phrases as we do when talking. [Do you] feel me? :) – Lambie Aug 3 '20 at 19:08
  • 1
    No worries. If this were my site, I'd allow all sorts of questions that are currently frowned upon. There is a writing/writers' site as well around here. – Lambie Aug 3 '20 at 19:36
  • 1
    Are you trying to say something like "found the void" or "hurt my toe on the void"? – Peter Aug 4 '20 at 7:16
  • 2
    Titles these days often need to be short. What about just "The Void"? – Peter Aug 5 '20 at 0:36
1

Now we have the context that this is for a 404 page I can see that your original suggestion

Oh, no! Stumbled on the void?

would work although I might have replaced on with into. Since we know by this point that they have reached a non-existent page I might have used

Oh, no! You seem to have stumbled into the void.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.