Is the sentence below acceptable.
If yes, why does it sound so weird?
If not, why? And what's the correct version? If there is a correct version which is not this, it can't express exactly this.
When I used to go to the river, I used to swim.
English Language Learners Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for speakers of other languages learning English. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityIs the sentence below acceptable.
If yes, why does it sound so weird?
If not, why? And what's the correct version? If there is a correct version which is not this, it can't express exactly this.
When I used to go to the river, I used to swim.
It may get repetitive to say "used to" many times. That isn't necessarily incorrect, but it sounds awkward. Here are some alternatives:
I used to go to the river and swim.
I used to go to the river, and would swim a lot.
When I used to go to the river, I would swim and play for hours.
When I used to go to the river, I would swim, and run, and have a picnic.
The "used to" construction suggests repeated action in the past, probably not continuing in the present. It's not clear how the two instance in your sentence are coupled.
You might mean
In the past I went to the river (often). When I did I swam.
or
In the past I went to the river (often). When I did I usually (but perhaps not always) swam. Then I continued going to the river but didn't swim.
or perhaps just
In the past I went to the river to swim.
or
I used to go to the river to swim.
The last two suggest that you still swim now, but somewhere else.
So I think your double use of "used to" is both awkward (as you note) and ambiguous. Try saying what you mean in another way.