Is this sentence grammatically correct?
Please be awaited for the results
Can you use past participle of verb immediately after be without to?
Sounds ok to me but I haven't heard it elsewhere.
English Language Learners Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for speakers of other languages learning English. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityIs this sentence grammatically correct?
Please be awaited for the results
Can you use past participle of verb immediately after be without to?
Sounds ok to me but I haven't heard it elsewhere.
You can use a past participle after be. It is the usual way of expressing the passive. If somebody is awaiting the results, then the results are awaited.
Your question suggests that you are confusing three different constructions:
A "continuous" tense (the present continuous is actually the normal present tense for most verbs):
I am awaiting the results.
The passive:
I am awaited. (= somebody is awaiting me)
The infinitive of obligation (rather a formal use):
I am to await the Director (= My duty/instructions/obligation is to await the Director).
As Jim 46 says, await is a formal word: in ordinary speech people would say "wait for" instead of "await" in all the above sentences.
You may use the past participle after be; there are examples where it is desirable to do so. “Let us be seen to retreat”, “Let us be done with arguing”, “To be satisfied, I need evidence”.
But your example is not in this class. It is not the speaker who is awaited, but the results. It should read “Please await the results”.
Please be awaited for the results
I think this sentence is grammatically incorrect. I would like to suggest you one of this forms: