0

Does exert power over something mean the same as wield power over something? For example:

  1. For many centuries, this community exerted a lot of power over these people.
  2. For many centuries, this community wielded a lot of power over these people.

Would sentence 1 and 2 mean exactly the same?

4
  • I would say that when you wield power it is a stance, not an action. When you exert that power, there is an effect. For wield please see Lexico: Have and be able to use (power or influence). Aug 19, 2020 at 20:40
  • @WeatherVane, The definition you mentioned is the second one, but the first one says "hold and use", so It does not seem to me that it does not mean an action.
    – Lalo
    Aug 19, 2020 at 20:51
  • 1
    The first definition is for an object such as a weapon. The second seems to be for your requested meaning. But anyway, someone wields a sword: they brandish it. In the example, the robber wielding a handgun, it does not mean 'shooting'. Aug 19, 2020 at 21:36
  • @WeatherVane, I see your point, but could they be, in some cases, interchangeable? If I say "This wields influence over that", how can something wield influence over something else without actually influencing it?
    – Lalo
    Aug 19, 2020 at 23:43

1 Answer 1

1

You can wield power without exerting it.

For instance, a policeman standing on a street corner can reduce crime (or at least relocate it) without actually arresting any criminals. The fact he could arrest people has an effect on their behavior.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .