I want to describe that I joined a newly opened college (it was new a decade ago, but no longer new). How to describe this to warn the reader that it is no longer new?

In 2000, I joined the newly (at that time) opened university XYZ.

Is the phrase [at that time] correctly placed? Is there any better alternative to warn the reader?


Then is your saviour here.

In 2000, I joined the then newly opened university XYZ.

then - at that time; at the time in question.

It points to a specific time/event in the past.

More examples:

I was still in school then when the attacks happened.

The play rules were different then.


In this case, I think your sentence is ok without the parenthetical clarification. Simply:

In 2000, I joined the newly opened university XYZ.

In more complex cases, you could clarify with a dependent clause:

In 2000, I joined the university XYZ, which had just received a 1st place ranking by AAA Reports.

(Note if you replace "had" with "has", the timeframe would change from 2000 to now)


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.