0

Could I say the sentence below?

"Eventually, by being unemployed they would not be able to cope with their living costs"

or should I use "could not" instead of "would not be able to"

Does it make sense at all?

1 Answer 1

1

Yes, you could say the sentence below -- albeit with a few minor adjustments.

The following sentence would be correct: 'Eventually, by being unemployed for a long enough period of time, they would not be able to cope with their living expenses.'

The part in italics is necessary because you need to give the cause of the draining of their money and the fact that they can't afford their living expenses. It is not because they are simply unemployed, but it is because they are unemployed for a long enough time that they no longer have enough money for their expenses.

Using 'could' here would just not make sense as you are talking about them not being able to afford their living costs because your sentence would be (if you used the substitution that you proposed) 'Eventually, by being unemployed, they could cope with their living costs.' This conveys basically the opposite of what (I believe) you are trying to say and additionally does not make sense at all.

4
  • OP's text isn't idiomatic anyway, so we're effectively having to guess the intended meaning. In which case I'm not sure we can rule out the possibility that could might actually be the "correct" word for the context: They could be[come] unable to cope with living costs if they were unemployed for long enough. Commented Nov 19, 2020 at 18:00
  • Sorry I did not write it properly. I meant "could not"
    – newdmk
    Commented Nov 19, 2020 at 18:03
  • Ok. Then disregard my final paragraph. I misunderstood what you were saying.
    – Joe Kerr
    Commented Nov 19, 2020 at 18:05
  • Sorry, it was my fault. Thank you very much for your help.
    – newdmk
    Commented Nov 20, 2020 at 8:40

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .