0

punch1 /pʌntʃ/ ●●● S3 verb [transitive]
1 HIT to hit someone or something hard with your fist
If I don't hit someone on my fist but I hit someone far from my fist with the other means (for example, with a gun), isn't it against grammar but is it just against usage? I quoted the definition to restrict the meaning of 'punch.'

2 Answers 2

2

Neither. There are a lot more meanings of punch than you quote so your question starts from a false premise.

I can put a mark onto a sword with a metal punch.

I can drink a fruit punch.

I can use a gun to punch a hole in the bad man.

I think you might have a meaningful question to ask but what you did ask doesn’t mean anything.

2
  • 1
    Note that the middle example is not a different sense of "punch" but an etymologically unrelated word, that happens to have the same spelling and sound. A fruit punch comes from Hindi, meaning "5" (as they originally were a mix of five ingredients)
    – James K
    Nov 28, 2020 at 7:49
  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    – Eddie Kal
    Nov 28, 2020 at 17:37
2

A sentence can be grammatical but nonsensical or meaningless; perhaps the most famous example is "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously", made up by Noam Chomsky. It is grammatically well-formed: it obeys all the rules of English grammar (for instance the verb "sleep" agrees with the subject "ideas"), but what does it mean? Nothing as far as either I or Chomsky can tell.

Similarly a sentence like "He punched me with his hair" or "He punched me over the telephone" might be considered nonsensical, or interpreted in a metaphorical way. Punch typically refers to hitting with a fist, although it can be used for other similar motions, but it would require something hard that makes a firm impact (e.g. a hole punch, a leather punch, etc). It would be correct to say that the word "punch" is misused.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .