11

"Naked" means "being without clothing" - so I guess "who are naked" means "who are very poor". Am I on the right track?

Pope Francis tweeted 1m ago:

Everyone is called to contribute with courage and determination to the respect for the fundamental rights of every person, especially the "invisible": of the many who are hungry and thirsty, who are naked, sick, outcast or imprisoned.

1
  • 5
    This may be opinion but the Pope could have meant they don't only have no clothes, but they have nothing. – Weather Vane Dec 10 '20 at 12:00
30

This is typical Biblical language: when all these adjectives are used together, we are encouraged to think of the needy in general. It's not so much about specific naked people. So, your interpretation is pretty good.

Typical examples:

I was naked and you clothed Me; I was sick and you visited Me; I was in prison and you came to Me.’ (Matthew 25:36)

Is it not to share your bread with the hungry, And that you bring to your house the poor who are cast out; When you see the naked, that you cover him, And not hide yourself from your own flesh? (Isaiah 58:7)

10
  • 17
    Yes, presumably the Biblical reference is to people too poor to have more than minimal clothing, rather than being literally naked. – Kate Bunting Dec 10 '20 at 12:56
  • 4
    @KateBunting I have seen someone so poor they were literally naked. – Loren Pechtel Dec 11 '20 at 6:10
  • 7
    @LorenPechtel whereas I have seen people being rich enough to afford vacations in an exclusive nudist camp. Or even people trying to get rich by being naked – Hagen von Eitzen Dec 11 '20 at 14:24
  • 1
    The fact that this question and answer have been so popular suggests that people will look at anything vaguely titillating! Fair enough. – legatrix Dec 11 '20 at 16:56
  • 1
    Can we maybe imply that back in biblical times when this was written, it was more common for people to be literally so poor they can't afford even basic minimal clothing? Nowadays, even homeless people can easily get free clothing from various charities, but maybe that wasn't the case back in the day? – Darrel Hoffman Dec 11 '20 at 19:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.