2

Just take a look at these sentences:

A: "You got arrested for driving under influence?"
B: "Yes . It happened a few days after my wife (had) told me that she wanted to separate, so I wasn't myself at the time."

Would this be more natural with 'had' ?

2
  • 1
    No, adding "had" would be wrong here. But you could say "Yes. My wife had just told me (a few days earlier) that she wanted to separate..."
    – TypeIA
    Dec 27 '20 at 16:02
  • 2
    Idiomatically, that's driving under the influence [of alcohol or other intoxicants]. But I disagree that there's anything "syntactically incorrect" about using Past Perfect (had) here. Both are fine - it's just that in practice, Simple Past is more likely. Come to that, it wouldn't be "incorrect" to express the initial It had happened... using the Perfect form - that's just very unlikely (and would require a rather contrived context to become the preferred choice of tense). Dec 27 '20 at 16:11
1

I mean, maybe a little bit. The use of "had" pushes the action a little further into the past, which creates distance and therefore a little more detachment, but I wouldn't say especially neutral.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.