0

I heard, "The store will be having a sale, not for today only"

What does "not for today only" mean in this sentence? Does the "only" modify "not for today" or does the "only" modify "today"?

Improve this question
3
  • 2
    I don't think that the person who said this was a native English-speaker. It is pointless trying to analyse bad English. (Note how the future tense of the main clause clashes with the idea that there is a sale today.)
    – user81561
    Dec 27, 2020 at 17:20
  • Unless this is a correction, it is, as Greybeard says, unidiomatic. "The store will be having a sale, and it will not just be for one day, Friday" is idiomatic, even with 'just' before 'be' rather than 'one'.
    – Edwin Ashworth
    Dec 27, 2020 at 17:42
  • 1
    "Standard" wording would be The store will be [is?] having a sale, [for] today only. So although in and of itself the cited usage isn't actually idiomatic (hence @Greybeard's comment), you just might encounter it from a native speaker using slightly quirky phrasing to draw attention to the fact that this particular sale isn't the normal "for today only" kind (maybe it lasts all week, I dunno). But in any event, only can only modify today, regardless of whether the standard construction is being [slightly facetiously] negated or not.
    – FumbleFingers
    Dec 27, 2020 at 17:43

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1

Because "for today, only" is a common expression in regard to sales, I would think it applies to the whole expression.

However, it's not the usual way of expressing it. Normally, a sale that last a week or a month would give the time, or omit it entirely. (The reason for giving "today only" is to make people think they better grab while it's available.)

Improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .