I have a small question about the usage of Google as a verb. Is it always capitalized, even as a verb? For instance:

I Googled his name and I got hundreds of results.

Now, I am aware that this is a neologism and as such, it's probably not going to be in any dictionaries, but what is the most common usage for Google as a verb? It really looks strange to me to write or read "Googled", hence my question.

  • 4
    Did you try looking it up in a dictionary? Here are some results: dictionary.reference.com/browse/google , merriam-webster.com/dictionary/google. And here is an article about it: googlesystem.blogspot.ch/2006/07/…
    – fluffy
    Jun 30, 2014 at 8:50
  • 3
    I try not to say 'G/google' or 'P/photoshop' as verbs. There are other search engines and photo editing programs.
    – Sydney
    Jun 30, 2014 at 11:02
  • 4
    @Cornstalks: As an adjective? I see that they write that, but it doesn't seem to make much sense ... according to that rule, a sentence such as "This is an absolutely Google search engine." would be allowable, whereas the sentence "In addition, Google may provide you with written requirements (...)." (from that very page) would not. That seems ... peculiar. Jun 30, 2014 at 18:26
  • 4
    "and never in the plural or possessive form.", then, two bullet points later: "Use only Google-approved artwork when using Google's logos." *scratches head*
    – Doc
    Jun 30, 2014 at 21:31
  • 3
    @O.R.Mapper Unfortunately, there's no requirement that IP lawyers actually understand language when writing about it publicly.
    – user230
    Jul 1, 2014 at 0:21

3 Answers 3


No. Google as a verb should not be capitalized. Because if you put 'G' capital, you mean the word 'Google' as a company (proper noun). You cannot company something.

I found this on Wikipedia. It's useful.

The first recorded usage of google used as a participle, thus supposing an intransitive verb, was on July 8, 1998, by Google co-founder Larry Page himself, who wrote on a mailing list: "Have fun and keep googling!"

Its earliest known use (as a transitive verb) on American television was in the "Help" episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer (October 15, 2002), when Willow asked Buffy, "Have you googled her yet?"

There's no first letter capital.

OALD has an entry of the verb google.

It's observed that when the tool of doing something becomes too popular (and omnipotent in its field!), its proper noun, over the period of time, becomes a verb and then the first capital letter is lowercased.

Another such proper nouns are --Photoshop, when used as a verb becomes photoshop (no capital) and Xerox, when used as a verb becomes xerox (no capital again).

On one blog (as fluffy says) it's written:

The verb "google" (no capital) has been used in the recent years with the meaning "search (something) on the web", even though you use other search engine than Google (capital).

[Generally, a verb is not capitalized. However, the only verb with first letter capital I have come across is Christianize. I had asked that question here on this board some time ago.]

Noun and verb usage:

Did you google this term? Vs. Did you search this term on Google?
You can photoshop this image to make it better Vs. You can make this image better using Photoshop.

  • 1
    Amazing answer! Thank you very much. I'm afraid I can't vote up just yet.
    – unpollito
    Jun 30, 2014 at 11:58
  • @PíoPío1949 thanks. That's okay. Your words say it all :) Good question though (+1). Many wonder this (including my teammates). But now they are convinced! :)
    – Maulik V
    Jun 30, 2014 at 11:58
  • 1
    FYI, that link you posted is not to Google's blog: "This blog is not affiliated with Google."
    – Ajedi32
    Jun 30, 2014 at 13:16
  • 8
    As a point, Google (the company) states explicitly that you should not say that you are googling something unless you use the Google search engine. This is due to trademark law - if 'Google' becomes ubiquitous to mean simply "search online" rather than specifically using Google, then Google would lose their rights to the word (it would become a Generic Trademark). Coca-Cola went through a similar battle with "Coke", as did Xerox and Kleenex.
    – Doc
    Jun 30, 2014 at 14:01
  • 1
    Of course, all of coke, xerox, and kleenex are now generic for many speakers. Google, too, for some.
    – user230
    Jun 30, 2014 at 23:34

I searched the The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) (1990-2012) for both google and googling, then used a script to count how many occurrences of each were capitalized.

Here's what I found:

  Googled   134       googled   17
  Googling  83        googling  19

So most occurrences (86%) in this corpus are still capitalized. This, I think, reflects more conservative style. You may wish to do the same—I certainly don't think it's incorrect to capitalize the verb.

However, when I repeat the experiment with The Corpus of Global Web-Based English (GloWbE) using a random sample of 1000 results for each term, I find:

  Googled   284       googled   726
  Googling  385       googling  626

This is quite a different result! Here, we find only 33% capitalization, as opposed to 86% in COCA. My feeling is that this reflects less conservative usage. Note that this corpus contains on average more recent usage, and that it doesn't have nearly as much copy-edited or formal content.

I believe it is now commonplace to write the verb google in lower case. If you like, you may follow more conservative usage and capitalize it, but there is no particular need to do so. My personal preference is for lower case.

  • True, leaving the term aside, it's obvious that we shouldn't capitalize it for two reasons. To avoid ambiguity and verbs are not capitalized - back to my concern of the word Christianize.
    – Maulik V
    Jul 1, 2014 at 2:18
  • 1
    @MaulikV You are free to advocate your own prescriptive view in your own answer. I prefer lower case, myself. But since there are so many capitalized examples in the wild, it would be silly to say capitalizing it is actually incorrect.
    – user230
    Jul 1, 2014 at 2:21

Ignore people telling you what Google the company would like. Even with all their money to pay the best lawyers in the world, they're not going to affect the eventual position. They're currently holding the line...


...but it's a racing cert they'll end up following in the footsteps of Heroin, Aspirin, and Hoover...




(The Hoover company was slow off the mark staking their claim to ownership of the word, so Hoover the room doesn't even occur often enough to graph.)

Personally, I tend to capitalise when I'm referring to things like the Google results page, Google Books, Google NGrams, etc., but not when it's just a verb (in which context I don't really care if I'm googling using a different search engine). Even if Google goes bust next year I expect that in a decade or two capitalising to Google = to search on the Internet (perhaps using Google) will be seen as "quaint".

  • I'm pretty sure that "Aspirin" was seized as enemy property (from Bayer) during WWI, and put in the public domain. "Heroin" may have suffered the same fate (it was originally a pharmaceutical), but may have already been illegal by WWI. Do these ngrams exclude words capitalized because they are the first word in a sentence? Finally, to "hoover" a carpet is very rare in the US.
    – Phil Perry
    Jul 1, 2014 at 3:21
  • 1
    Well, interestingly, there are possibilities that the sentences begin with the word Googling. (Googling is the simplest way to find information on anything) and thus are capitalized. Also, in such cases, they serve as a noun and not a verb. The OP is quite specific about to do (verb) where capitalization is generally not observed.
    – Maulik V
    Jul 1, 2014 at 4:22
  • @Phil, Maulik: Okay, I've changed the first NGram to only chart verb usages. It's still the same story - currently most people do capitalise, but I'm sure that won't last. Jul 1, 2014 at 8:32
  • I don't see any clear trend in either direction (yet). About the same fraction of users capitalize over a long period of time.
    – Phil Perry
    Jul 1, 2014 at 16:51
  • 2
    @Phil: Absolutely! Which is why I think the top-rated answer here is potentially misleading (where's the sense in telling people that non-capitalising is "correct" when the majority are still doing that?). But we're talking about a very new usage here (unknown to most Anglophones even a decade ago). The point of my answer is I'm absolutely certain usage patterns will shift significantly over the next decade or two, and I've supplied other examples showing that's the general tendency (regardless of what Google, Inc.'s lawyers try to do about it). Jul 1, 2014 at 16:57

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .