1

Being a non-native English speaker, I could not understand at all the meaning of the following GRE Text Completion. That was basically a three blank answer choice. For convenience, I'm filling the answers in the blanks in "Bold" format. Please explain what the sentence means in very simple terms:

The question as to what constitutes art is hardly a contemporary one. Today, artists exist whose main goal seems only to subvert work that no longer warrants the trite tag, “cutting-edge.” Once the proverbial envelope is pushed even further, the public inevitably scratches its collective head - or furrows the collective brow - thinking that this time the “artists” have gone too far. That very same admixture of contempt and confusion, however, was not unknown in Michelangelo's day; only what was considered blasphemous, art-wise, in the 16th Century, would today be considered failed to provoke.

2

I might render the passage as:

The question of what makes something "art" is not a new one. Some artists today seem to have as their main purpose to mock art that can no longer be called "cutting edge" -- a label which is only a cliche. When art goes too far beyond the usual, people are puzzled or upset by it, and think that the artists have gone beyond proper limits. A similar public response, a mixture of contempt and confusion, has been a reaction to art for a long time, as far back as the age of Michelangelo. But the art that in the 16th Century provoked contempt and confusion as too original, would now be seen as old-fashioned, out-of-date, not original enough to provoke interest.

I have taken a few liberties with the rephrasing, but I think I have captured the sense of the quoted passage in somewhat simpler and less metaphoric language. The passage is not great writing. It does not focus on a single idea, but shifts its focus more than a single paragraph really should. It makes use of both cliche and jargon.

As to the specific terms asked about:

"contemporary" here means "of the current time" and "is hardly a contemporary one" simply means "is not new".

"gone too far" and "goes too far" are common fixed phrases, meaning that something has become improper by carrying a tenancy beyond a proper point. The idea of "going" in the phrase is usually metaphorical, it often means "has changed too much".

"failed to provoke" is a piece of art-criticism jargon, and here is technically grammatically incorrect as well. A piece of art is said to have "failed to provoke" when it is old-fashioned or unoriginal, and does not stimulate interest in the observer. This is an opinion, a judgement, phrased as if it were an objective fact.

"scratches its collective head" means that the general public ism puzzled or confused.

"furrows the collective brow" means that the general public is annoyed or angry or disgusted or showing contempt.

Both of these last two are taking stereotypical individual gestures showing emotion or attitude and applying them to a group. They could be thoguht of as personifying the general public as if it were a single collective person.

4
  • Thank you so much Mr. @David Siegel for making such a tough text completion very clear. It would be kind enough if you please construe the meaning of the phrase "or furrows the collective brow" in the above text completion question I posted. You did not mention its meaning separately., may be, you did not think it necessary. Jan 18 at 18:37
  • @Md. Samiul Abid see addition to answer above. Jan 18 at 20:11
  • I could not thank you more, Mr. @David Siegel. You are really, really, awesome. It is the benevolent guys like you for whose contributions the present society is reaping tremendous benefits. May the Almighty bless you. Jan 19 at 4:23
  • @Md.SamiulAbid if this answer helped you you can accept it by clicking on the tick (US = check mark)
    – mdewey
    Jan 19 at 15:23
0

Many native speakers will be in the same boat as you. The author is trying much too hard to sound clever. The last three words are bad English. Better: “Would be considered to have failed to provoke”. And “admixture” instead of “mixture” is just pointless; “mixture” is actually the better word.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.